Integrity of creative image for writing an analysis of literary work
Consciousness can work as a psyche, additionally the psyche as being a consciousness. The prerequisites for artistic creativity, these sides are inseparably in principle as a basis. In technology, we depend on a consciousness that runs with essences, wanting to expel feelings and experiences. In art and literature, emotion contains thought, in idea – feeling. The image is a synthesis of awareness and psyche, ideas and feelings.
What’s the basis for artistic creativity in literary analysis?
This appears to be the true foundation of artistic imagination, that will be possible just because consciousness and psyche, being autonomous spheres, are in the time that is same connected. It is impractical to lessen the image into the concept (towards the goal of the principles): we ought to distract ourselves from feelings. To cut back the image to direct experience way to “not notice” the turnover associated with psyche, being able to be fraught with idea.
But, the integrity regarding the image isn’t just a sensually observed idea (concept). The image just isn’t yet an easy method regarding the presence of simultaneously several ideas (a system of ideas). The image is basically multivalued, it simultaneously contains several aspects. Technology can not afford this. Ideas decrease an object phenomenon that is( to one aspect, as much as one minute, deliberately abstracting from others. Science explores phenomena analytically with subsequent synthesis, exercising all of the moments of interrelation. Art, however, thinks with regards to the meanings. More over, the existence of the sum of definitions is a vital condition for the “life” regarding the creative image. It is impossible to determine what could be the true meaning, what’s the “more important” meaning.
Concept of artistic concept of literary work
Theoretically, artistic content could be paid down up to a clinical, up to a logically developed system of concepts. But in practice this is certainly impossible, which is not required. We’re coping with the abyss of meanings. Even over the problem of the look of new semantic overtones, brand new deep meanings, about “self-production” of definitions in traditional works. Since a work could be recognized into the end only when the absolute logical unfolding of images is recognized, it could be argued that the information of a very creative tasks are an endless process.
Therefore, the image is indecomposable. Its perception can only be holistic: as a personal experience of thought, as a sensually perceived essence. This is exactly why the analysis that is scientific of work is a “double general” cognition of artistic integrity: besides that the inexhaustibility of definitions cannot be paid down to a method, with such cognition, the sufficient perception of thoughts – empathy – is kept out from the brackets.
The utmost complete perception for the object that is aesthetic always multifaceted:
- way of integrity through clinical dialectical logic.